Criterion II

Criterion II - Teaching-Learning and Evaluation

Key Indicator - 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile

2.1.1

2.1.1: Enrolment percentage

2.1.1.1. Number of students admitted year wise during last five years

2.1.1.2. Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years

71.97 %

 

2.1.1.1. Number of students admitted year wise during last five years 

Year2021-222020-212019-202018-192017-18
Number of Students Admitted   570   376   399   495   450

 

 2.1.1.2. Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years

Year2021-222020-212019-202018-192017-18
Number of Sanctioned Seats   640   646   604   671   621

 

Supporting document:Click Here

 


2.1.2

2.1.2: Percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy) during the last five years (Exclusive of supernumerary seats)

100 %

 

2.1.2.1. Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories year wise during last five  years 

Year2021-222020-212019-202018-192017-18
Number of actual students admitted  320  244  254  281  263

 

2.1.2.2. Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GOI/State Govt.rule  year wise during last five years

Year2021-222020-212019-202018-192017-18
Number of Seats Earmarked  320  244  254  281  263

 

Supporting document:Click Here

Key Indicator- 2.2. Student Teacher Ratio

2.2

2.2.1: Student – Full time Teacher Ratio
(Data for the latest completed academic year)

17.76

Number of students year wise during the last five years

Year2021-222020-212019-202018-192017-18
Number of students year wise during the last five years  1598  1497 1396  1497  1514

 

Supporting document:Click Here

Number of teaching staff / full time teachers year wise during the last five years

Year2021-222020-212019-202018-192017-18
Number of Full Time Teachers90848889112

 

Supporting document:Click Here

Key Indicator- 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process

2.3.1

2.3.1 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences using ICT tools.

Experiential learning is a crucial aspect 

  • Industry Visit and Internship: Internships and industry visits offer practical experience, enhancing students' skills and knowledge with real-world applications

  • Project and Project-based learning: Experiential learning involves hands-on activities and reflection. Project-based learning applies acquired knowledge to real-world problem-solving

  • Differnt ICT tools like Online Learning Platform: Blogs , Youtube Channel allow students to reflect on their learning experiences along with Smart projector, 3D printer enhances the experience.

  • Flipped Classroom: Video-Based Learning: Using platforms like Edpuzzle, The flipped classroom model, in which students watch instructional videos and complete quizzes outside of class, allows for more in-class time dedicated to hands-on activities and discussion.

  • Digital Resource Cell established during pandeic to Monitoring online teaching learning process, provide necessary facilities for online teaching for teachers,To train teachers with new tools for online teaching.

  • NSS Activities: it allows students to apply their knowledge and skills in real-world situations, allowing them to gain hands-on experience and develop a deeper understanding of the material.

  • Nature Club awares the students about enivornment and giving contribution.

  • Professional Society Chapters and Student Clubs: Chapters and Clubs provide opportunities for students to attend seminars, webinars, and workshops and participate in competitions and events.

  • EDC Visits: This can provide students with the opportunity to learn about entrepreneurship and observe real-world business practices. This type of experiential learning can help students to develop an understanding of the entrepreneurial process and identify potential business opportunities.

Participative learning

  • Project Competition: ‘Unnat Bharat Abhiyan,’ ‘Smart India Hackathon,’ 'AICTE Chhatra Vishwakarma' and Project Competition are different platforms that provide opportunities for students to learn through participation. 

  • Active Learning: To foster interactive learning, students engage in activity-based learning, game pedagogy, role-playing, Revise yourself, case studies, quizzes based on Video, group discussions, flipped classrooms, etc.

  • eLearning Platform: Students enroll and complete the MOOC courses, NPTEL, Udemy etc.

  • Student’s Club: The Institute has various cells like Soft Skill Development Cell, Writing Skill Development, Holistic Development, Sustainability and Financial Literacy Club, Student Club, Cultural Fest, etc., that encourage students to provide participatory learning. 

  • Paper Publication: Students actively participate as writers, editors, and designers for magazines published in the institution. Students write and Publish papers and patents.

Problem-solving

  • Project Development: The institute encourages students to undertake projects aimed at solving real-world industrial, societal, and environmental problems.

  • Real-life Challenges: To support these activities, various platforms such as 'Unnat Bharat Abhiyan,' 'Smart India Hackathon,' 'Robocon,' and SAE projects like BAJA are made available to students, providing opportunities for them to come up with innovative solutions to real-life challenges.

  • Real-world Problems: These experiences help students to apply their skills and knowledge to real problems, develop critical thinking and problem-solving abilities, and prepare them for real-world careers.

  • Sponsored Project: Sponsored projects can be an effective way for students to develop problem-solving skills. In a sponsored project, students work on a real-world problem.

  • Learning Management System: Quizzes, puzzles, animation videos, movie making, and Google Classroom assignments can all be effective tools for helping students to develop their problem-solving skills.

    

Supporting document:Click Here

Key Indicator- 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality

2.4.1

2.4.1: Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years

2.4.1.1: Number of Sanctioned posts / required positions for teaching staff/ full time teachers year wise during the last five years

2.4.1: Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years

100 %

2.4.1.1: Number of Sanctioned posts / required positions for teaching staff/ full time teachers year wise during the last five years

Year2021-222020-212019-202018-192017-18
Number of Sanctioned posts83838686111

 

Year2021-222020-212019-202018-192017-18
Number of Full Time Teachers90848889112

 

Supporting document:Click Here

 


2.4.2

2.4.2 Percentage of full-time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for the count)

2.4.2.1: Number of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. year wise during the last five years

2.4.2 Percentage of full-time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for the count)

16.41%

2.4.2.1: Number of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. year wise during the last five years

Year2021-222020-212019-202018-192017-18
Number of full time teachers with NET/SET/Ph. D.1915151413
Number of full time teachers90848889112

 

Supporting document:Click Here

Key Indicator- 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms

2.5.1

2.5.1: Mechanism of internal/external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient

The institution is affiliated with Savitribai Phule Pune University (SPPU) and adheres to the Examination Scheme of SPPU. SPPU Examination Scheme includes in-semester, end-semester, oral/practical examinations, and term work. 

In theory courses, Internal assessments tests are conducted as per the Academic Calendar of the Institute and Department. The internal assessment mechanism is robust and follows the standard examination norms. Assessment tools are selected based on the structure and syllabus prescribed by the University and discussed with course teachers and domain/module coordinators and communicated to the students.       

For each semester, two internal tests for students are conducted by the Department 

Process :

  1. The Course Incharge prepares the question paper by referring to previous years question papers of the University and previous internal question papers.

  2. Questions relevant to Bloom’s Taxonomy and Course Outcome are identified.

  3. The Course Incharge also defines the marking scheme for each question.

  4. The Module Coordinator verifies the question paper and marking scheme, difficulty level, marks allocation, and relevance to CO and BT.

  5. Suggestions and Corrections if any are incorporated by the course incharge in the question paper.

  6. Conduction of Examination is done as per schedule.

  7. Changes in schedules, patterns, and methods if any, are immediately notified to the students

  8. Evaluation of answer sheets is done based on a marking scheme, and the result is communicated to students.

  9. Students are free to interact with the teacher to resolve any grievances regarding the assessment in the classroom while teacher shows answersheet to them .

  10. Average marks of all tests for all courses are also considered in termwork to increase the regularity and intensity of internal tests among students.

  11. Rubrics are followed for Term work and Practicals Assessment, Compulsory Assignments, Project Based Learning, Seminars, and Project Work.  

Redressal of grievances

  • The continuous evaluation of students is carried out by faculty regarding theory lectures, labs, assignments, and tests.

  • The Institute appoints a College Examination Officer for the smooth conduction of examinations.

  • If students are facing any problems, they are solved by the College Examination Officer. The grievances during the conduction of online/theory examinations are considered and discussed in consultation with the Principal. If needed, they are forwarded to the university by the examination section.

Redressal of grievances at the University level 

  • The queries related to results, corrections in mark sheets, and other certificates issued by the university are handled at the SPPU examination section after forwarding such queries through the college examination section.

  • Students can apply for revaluation, recounting, and challenge evaluation by paying the necessary processing fees to the university.

 

Supporting document:Click Here

Key Indicator- 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes

2.6.1

2.6.1: Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and attainment of POs and COs are evaluated

 

In strict compliance with the objectives of Outcome Based Education(OBE), the Program Outcomes (POs), Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs), and Course Outcomes (COs) are framed by the department offering the concerned program after rigorous consultation with all faculty and stakeholders.

The following section discusses the process of CO framing for all courses in all programmes:

  • CO statements are framed using unit-specific course materials from the course syllabus.

  • Course Outcomes describe anticipated learning outcomes for each course (COs).

  • By taking into account the necessary learner abilities and skills to be acquired, CO statements address the appropriate Bloom's Taxonomy (BT) levels.

  • COs are mapped with POs and PSOs that have correlation scores of 1- Slight (Low), 2- Moderate (Medium), and 3- Significant (High).

  • The mapping of COs to POs and PSOs yields CO-PO and CO-PSO matrices, respectively.

PO and CO Communication Mechanisms: Program outcomes (POs) are conveyed to students, teachers, staff, and other stakeholders in the following ways:

  1. Displayed at the departments' main door.

  2. Website of the institute for publication.

  3. Offered through various value-added courses, workshops, seminars, and induction programmes.

  4. Conveyed throughout tutor meetings and the teaching learning process.

  5. Published regularly in the institute brochure and the departmental magazine.

  6. Printed on lab manuals and project log books

The following methods are used to convey course outcomes (COs) to the students:

  • COs are available on the institute's website and department webpage.

  • COs are made available to students for quick reference in the form of course syllabus copies, notes, handouts, and lab manuals.

  • Students can also access course syllabus copies, notes, presentations, and lab manuals in digital media formats.

Supporting document:Click Here

2.6.2

2.6.2: Pass percentage of Students during last five years

2.6.2.1: Number of final year students who passed the university examination year wise during the last five years

2.6.2.2: Number of final year students who appeared for the university examination year-wise during the last five years

92.29%

2.6.2.1: Number of final year students who passed the university examination year wise during the last five years

Year2021-222020-212019-202018-192017-18
Number of final year students who passed the university examination 417448404418335

 

2.6.2.2: Number of final year students who appeared for the university examination year-wise during the last five years

Year2021-222020-212019-202018-192017-18
Number of final year students who appeared for the university examination485458416459373

 

Supporting document:Click Here

Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey

2.7

2.7.1: Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process

Supporting document:Click Here